| U.S.- Iraq ProCon.org | HOME | CLOSE |
| Name: | William Bradford | |||||||||
| Title: |
Former Assistant Professor of Law, Indiana University
|
|||||||||
| Position: |
Pro
to the question "Should the U.S. have attacked Iraq?"
|
|||||||||
| Reasoning: | "The question of state responsibilities in the event that the Security Council fails to grant the requested authorization while doing little to quell the impression that subsequent acts of self-defense against the alleged threat would lack the requisite quantum of legal legitimacy is precisely the issue presented in the case of Iraq in March 2003. Although states generally tailor their conduct to conform with principles of international law, where they perceive, rightly or wrongly, an emergent threat to their survival or their vital interests their propensity is to react without regard to legal ramifications or the potential for condemnation by the international community."
"The Duty to Defend Them: A Natural Law Justification for the Bush Doctrine of Preventive War", Notre Dame Law Review, 2004
|
|||||||||
|
Credibility Ranking: |
Those individuals and organizations involved in the U.S.- Iraq debate who do not fit into the above star categories.
|
|||||||||
| Involvement: |
|
|||||||||
| Education: |
|
|||||||||
| Affiliations/ Honors: |
|
|||||||||
| Contact Info: |
|
|||||||||
| Other: |
|
|||||||||